On 2/9/2015 3:45 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>  Commented upon by hiren and sbruno
>>  See Phabricator D1777 for more details.
>>
>>  Commented upon by hiren and sbruno
>>  Reviewed by:        adrian, jhb and bz
> I have not reviewed this;  as a matter of fact you are aware that I still 
> wanted to do that.
> 

Something about Phabricator is not jiving with our commit terminology.
This has happened before as well with other commits. I'm sure everyone
is good-intentioned as well.

There's not 1 person on D1777 who has 'accepted' it. That is what
warrants a 'Reviewed by' to me.

It's clear to me, but seems unclear to others. I really think the
reviewer list needs to be split up. Rather than using icons, use
separate lists. Reviewers requested: accepted: commented: changes
requested:.



-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to