In message: <4b8af55c.6040...@freebsd.org>
Nathan Whitehorn <nwhiteh...@freebsd.org> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20100228195041.ga68...@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
: > Peter Jeremy <peterjer...@acm.org> writes:
: > : On 2010-Feb-26 14:57:36 +0100, Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org>
: > wrote:
: > : >For the future, however, probabilly we would need to do something
: > like
: > : >pc98 already does wrt i386 (i386/include/ pc98/include/
: > amd64/include/
: > : >just have files wrappers to the generic one under x86/include/ when
: > : >necessary).
: > : : Not that something like this is also critical for getting
: > i386/amd64
: > : cross compilation to work - one of the blocking issues is that the
: > : correct machine/ includes are not available in cross-compilatio
: > mode.
: >
: > Huh?
: >
: > I cross build all the time, and the machine/ includes are always
: > right, with or without this patch. Maybe you could explain what you
: > mean here...
: >
: > The issue is that old code has
: >
: > #include <i386/isa.h>
: >
: > or whatever in it, and we need to have an i386/isa.h that's just
: > #include <x86/isa.h>
: >
: > Warner
: >
: I'm guessing what was meant is that one benefit of a merged tree (like
: we will have with powerpc) is that you can do cc -m32 on a 64-bit host
: to get a 32-bit binary, which is less than trivial now.
True enough. But we don't have anywhere close to a merged tree on
x86, and won't for the foreseeable future. I don't really want to see
an include32, when all the cross building tools exist in the tree
already (see XDEV in Makefile.inc1)... If you are cross building, you
really need a full cross building environment. The -m32 hacks we have
now are, as you describe, insufficient to the task...
Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
