On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans <b...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>> There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in
>> CURRENT.  This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and X64 so
>> they correctly reflect the size they operate upon.
>>
>> What do y'all think?
>
> Now I suggest delaying this until they can be renamed to a type- generic
> SYSCTL_INT() (would probably need to be spelled differently, SYSCTL_I()
> say, even if SYSCTL_INT() was changed at the same time).

I'm torn on this one.  The compiler knows the type (unless, for
SYSCTL_INT, NULL/0 is used, but that is also a compile-time check),
but to interpret it requires the use of __builtin_foo which is a gcc
extension and not part of standard C.

Philosophically, while I like this kind of letting the compiler do the
work, if you want C++ you know where to find it.

Thanks,
matthew
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to