On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 10:48:17AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: K> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:27:39PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: K> > Hi Konstantin, K> > K> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:50:44PM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote: K> > K> Author: kib K> > K> Date: Fri Jul 6 19:50:44 2018 K> > K> New Revision: 336047 K> > K> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336047 K> > K> K> > K> Log: K> > K> Expand x86 struct pcpus to UMA_PCPU_ALLOC_SIZE AKA PAGE_SIZE. K> > K> K> > K> This restores counters(9) operation. K> > K> Revert r336024. Improve assert of pcpu size on x86. K> > K> K> > K> Reviewed by: mmacy K> > K> Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation K> > K> Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16163 K> > K> > Since this has been broken already several times as people who edit K> > surrounding code don't understand the magic, and since now we round K> > the struct pcpu size to PAGE_SIZE anyways, what about stop carefully K> > craft the padding and just change alignment of struct pcpu to PAGE_SIZE? K> I do not see how it would avoided that breakage. Also, I like the K> explicitness in the padding, it is useful when new pcpu members are K> added. I have to do that more than once this year.
I was wrong. __aligned would do proper placement of items in an array, but sizeof would return lesser value. -- Gleb Smirnoff _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"