On 09.08.2018 17:28, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> Author: ae >> Date: Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018 >> New Revision: 337536 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337536 >> >> Log: >> If -q flag is specified, do not complain when we are trying to delete >> nonexistent NAT instance or nonexistent rule. > > It would probably be better to not overload -q with what is > usually a -f like functionality of a command. Sadly -f is > already used in ipfw, so another option should be choosen. > >> This allows execute batched `delete` commands and do not fail when >> found nonexistent rule. > > So now I can not code a quiet ipfw command that does fail when > I give it a bad delete command :-(.
Previously -q did not handled by delete command, so you can just use bad "ipfw delete" without -q :) -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
