On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:39:24AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On 9/20/18 8:54 AM, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:23:11AM +0000, Matt Macy wrote: > >> Author: mmacy > >> Date: Sun Jul 15 00:23:10 2018 > >> New Revision: 336299 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336299 > >> > >> Log: > >> msun: add ld80/ld128 powl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl from openbsd > >> > >> This corresponds to the latest status (hasn't changed in 9+ > >> years) from openbsd of ld80/ld128 powl, and source cpowf, cpow, > >> cpowl (the complex power functions for float complex, double > >> complex, and long double complex) which are required for C99 > >> compliance and were missing from FreeBSD. Also required for > >> some numerical codes using complex numbered Hamiltonians. > >> > >> Thanks to jhb for tracking down the issue with making > >> weak_reference compile on powerpc. > >> > >> When asked to review, bde said "I don't like it" - but > >> provided no actionable feedback or superior implementations. > >> > >> Discussed with: jhb > >> Submitted by: jmd > >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15919 > > > > This seems to have broken the gcc build: > > https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc/ > > > > /workspace/src/lib/msun/ld80/e_powl.c:275:1: error: floating constant > > exceeds range of 'long double' [-Werror=overflow] > > if( y >= LDBL_MAX ) > > ^~ > > Which architecture? i386 doesn't get build with i386-xtoolchain-gcc pending > some patches I haven't yet posted for review related to the weirdness we do > with floating point on i386.
This is the -m32 build on amd64. I haven't tested it myself, but Mark Millard noted that the issue might be fixed by a gcc update. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"