On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:10:27PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > Author: obrien > Date: Tue Jan 29 20:10:27 2019 > New Revision: 343561 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/343561 > > Log: > Follow arm[32] and sparc64 KAPI and provide the FreeBSD standard spelling > across all architectures for this header. > > Reviewed by: stevek > Obtained from: Juniper Networks > > Added: > head/sys/arm64/include/sigframe.h > - copied unchanged from r343560, head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h > head/sys/riscv/include/sigframe.h > - copied unchanged from r343560, head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h > > Copied: head/sys/arm64/include/sigframe.h (from r343560, > head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h) > ============================================================================== > --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) > +++ head/sys/arm64/include/sigframe.h Tue Jan 29 20:10:27 2019 > (r343561, copy of r343560, head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h) > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +/* $FreeBSD$ */ > +#include <machine/frame.h> > > Copied: head/sys/riscv/include/sigframe.h (from r343560, > head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h) > ============================================================================== > --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) > +++ head/sys/riscv/include/sigframe.h Tue Jan 29 20:10:27 2019 > (r343561, copy of r343560, head/sys/arm/include/sigframe.h) > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +/* $FreeBSD$ */ > +#include <machine/frame.h>
All other architectures are careful to only provide sigframe definition in machine/sigframe.h. For instance trapframes are not exposed. This is the main reason why frame.h and sigframe.h both exist. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"