On 2/26/19 9:33 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> On 2/25/19 5:11 PM, K. Macy wrote: >>>> This commit needed more through review. >>> >>> How would this be achieved:? I had several people on the review and no >>> one had substantive feedback. >> >> As a developer it is your responsibility to be aware of the policies that >> we do document. One of the things in the license policy Brooks pointed you >> at is that adding new GPL code requires core@ sign off. This doesn't mean >> core@ will say know. It does mean that core@ has to make an explicit >> decision. >> >> (I know Brooks said he intended to update the policy, but in fact it >> already requires core@ sign off for any new code that isn't following >> one of the accepted licenses which are all BSD/MIT-style licenses.) > > In defense of K Macy here, the copy of this text in the publically > visible committers guide does not say that. Hence my earlier mail > about is this text planned as an update to what is in the committers > guide. Or can you point me to something in the public area that > points at this /internal/license.html file?
Things on internal/ are "public" as far as developers are concerned. The title of https://www.freebsd.org/internal/policies.html is "Policies for FreeBSD Project Members" and references the committers guide as well as additional policies rather than the other way around. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"