on 13/03/2011 08:35 Artem Belevich said the following: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger > <alexan...@leidinger.net> wrote: >> But this looks like it will be named linux32 in any case. In the short >> term I would prefer: >> ---snip--- >> #if defined(__amd64__) >> #define MODNAME "linux32" >> #elif defined(__i386__) >> #define MODNAME "linux" >> #endif >> ---snip--- > > Makes sense. It's what's done with freebsd syscalls -- 'freebsd' for > native syscalls, freebsd32 for 32-bit compat.
BTW, in my opinion, it might not make a lot of sense. That is, we can have native and compat FreeBSD system calls, but Linux system calls are always compat and never native, whether the emulation is for the same arch or not. Explicit suffix makes things clearer. But that's just my opinion. A public mailing list may be a better place to discuss this further. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
