On January 15, 2020 2:38:05 PM PST, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: >On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:44:53AM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: >J> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >J> >J> > Author: glebius >J> > Date: Wed Jan 15 06:05:20 2020 >J> > New Revision: 356755 >J> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356755 >J> > >J> > Log: >J> > Introduce NET_EPOCH_CALL() macro and use it everywhere where we >free >J> > data based on the network epoch. The macro reverses the >argument >J> > order of epoch_call(9) - first function, then its argument. NFC >J> >J> Is there some practical impact of changing the argument order or >does it >J> just seem more natural to you? > >It is just more natural. I'm suggesting to change prototype of >epoch_call() >to the same order as well.
Yes. Are there any ports that might be affected, such as kms-drm or virtualbox-ose-kmod? -- Pardon the typos and autocorrect, small keyboard in use. Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: https://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
