On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 9:55 AM John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2/27/20 7:30 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > Author: imp > > Date: Thu Feb 27 15:30:13 2020 > > New Revision: 358392 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358392 > > > > Log: > > _Static_assert is to be preferred to CTASSERT. > > > > Document the existing prefernce that _Static_assert be used in > preference to the > > old CTASSERT we used to use for compile time assertions. > > Actually, I think what we want to use is static_assert(). The intention in > userland C is that _Static_assert() is an internal keyword and <assert.h> > adds static_assert() as an alias, similar to <stdalign.h> defining alignas, > etc. I think what we should do for the kernel is have <sys/systm.h> define > map static_assert to _Static_assert and replace existing _Static_assert > usage with the proper spelling. >
I originally did just that when people pointed out that there were hundreds of instances in the tree of _Static_assert and less than 10 of static_assert. We could do a sweep and change, but I wanted to document it. Even more so because I was originally mistaken. Warner John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"