Author: mjg
Date: Fri Oct 16 00:56:13 2020
New Revision: 366743
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/366743

Log:
  cache: support negative entry promotion in slowpath smr

Modified:
  head/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c

Modified: head/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c   Fri Oct 16 00:55:57 2020        (r366742)
+++ head/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c   Fri Oct 16 00:56:13 2020        (r366743)
@@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ cache_negative_init(struct namecache *ncp)
        ns->neg_flag = 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Move a negative entry to the hot list.
+ */
 static void
 cache_negative_promote(struct namecache *ncp)
 {
@@ -823,6 +826,87 @@ cache_negative_promote(struct namecache *ncp)
        }
 }
 
+/*
+ * Move a negative entry to the hot list if it matches the lookup.
+ *
+ * We have to take locks, but they may be contended and in the worst
+ * case we may need to go off CPU. We don't want to spin within the
+ * smr section and we can't block with it. Exiting the section means
+ * the found entry could have been evicted. We are going to look it
+ * up again.
+ */
+static bool
+cache_negative_promote_cond(struct vnode *dvp, struct componentname *cnp,
+    struct namecache *oncp, uint32_t hash)
+{
+       struct namecache *ncp;
+       struct neglist *nl;
+       u_char nc_flag;
+
+       nl = NCP2NEGLIST(oncp);
+
+       mtx_lock(&nl->nl_lock);
+       /*
+        * For hash iteration.
+        */
+       vfs_smr_enter();
+
+       /*
+        * Avoid all surprises by only succeeding if we got the same entry and
+        * bailing completely otherwise.
+        * XXX There are no provisions to keep the vnode around, meaning we may
+        * end up promoting a negative entry for a *new* vnode and returning
+        * ENOENT on its account. This is the error we want to return anyway
+        * and promotion is harmless.
+        *
+        * In particular at this point there can be a new ncp which matches the
+        * search but hashes to a different neglist.
+        */
+       CK_SLIST_FOREACH(ncp, (NCHHASH(hash)), nc_hash) {
+               if (ncp == oncp)
+                       break;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * No match to begin with.
+        */
+       if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
+               goto out_abort;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * The newly found entry may be something different...
+        */
+       if (!(ncp->nc_dvp == dvp && ncp->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
+           !bcmp(ncp->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, ncp->nc_nlen))) {
+               goto out_abort;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * ... and not even negative.
+        */
+       nc_flag = atomic_load_char(&ncp->nc_flag);
+       if ((nc_flag & NCF_NEGATIVE) == 0) {
+               goto out_abort;
+       }
+
+       if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
+               goto out_abort;
+       }
+
+       cache_negative_promote(ncp);
+
+       SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
+       counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
+       vfs_smr_exit();
+       mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
+       return (true);
+out_abort:
+       vfs_smr_exit();
+       mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
+       return (false);
+}
+
 static void
 cache_negative_hit(struct namecache *ncp)
 {
@@ -1455,7 +1539,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, struct vnode **vpp, st
        uint32_t hash;
        enum vgetstate vs;
        int error;
-       bool whiteout;
+       bool whiteout, neg_hot;
        u_short nc_flag;
 
        MPASS((tsp == NULL && ticksp == NULL) || (tsp != NULL && ticksp != 
NULL));
@@ -1532,21 +1616,23 @@ negative_success:
                }
        }
 
-       SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
        cache_out_ts(ncp, tsp, ticksp);
-       counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
        whiteout = (ncp->nc_flag & NCF_WHITE);
-       /*
-        * TODO: We need to take locks to promote an entry. Code doing it
-        * in SMR lookup can be modified to be shared.
-        */
        ns = NCP2NEGSTATE(ncp);
-       if ((ns->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) == 0 ||
-           !cache_ncp_canuse(ncp)) {
+       neg_hot = ((ns->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) != 0);
+       if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
                vfs_smr_exit();
                goto out_fallback;
        }
-       vfs_smr_exit();
+       if (neg_hot) {
+               vfs_smr_exit();
+               if (!cache_negative_promote_cond(dvp, cnp, ncp, hash))
+                       goto out_fallback;
+       } else {
+               SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, 
ncp->nc_name);
+               counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
+               vfs_smr_exit();
+       }
        if (whiteout)
                cnp->cn_flags |= ISWHITEOUT;
        return (ENOENT);
@@ -3373,90 +3459,21 @@ cache_fplookup_vnode_supported(struct vnode *vp)
        return (vp->v_type != VLNK);
 }
 
-/*
- * Move a negative entry to the hot list.
- *
- * We have to take locks, but they may be contended and in the worst
- * case we may need to go off CPU. We don't want to spin within the
- * smr section and we can't block with it. Instead we are going to
- * look up the entry again.
- */
 static int __noinline
 cache_fplookup_negative_promote(struct cache_fpl *fpl, struct namecache *oncp,
     uint32_t hash)
 {
        struct componentname *cnp;
-       struct namecache *ncp;
-       struct neglist *nl;
        struct vnode *dvp;
-       u_char nc_flag;
 
        cnp = fpl->cnp;
        dvp = fpl->dvp;
 
-       nl = NCP2NEGLIST(oncp);
        cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
-
-       mtx_lock(&nl->nl_lock);
-       /*
-        * For hash iteration.
-        */
-       cache_fpl_smr_enter(fpl);
-
-       /*
-        * Avoid all surprises by only succeeding if we got the same entry and
-        * bailing completely otherwise.
-        * XXX There are no provisions to keep the vnode around, meaning we may
-        * end up promoting a negative entry for a *new* vnode and returning
-        * ENOENT on its account. This is the error we want to return anyway
-        * and promotion is harmless.
-        *
-        * In particular at this point there can be a new ncp which matches the
-        * search but hashes to a different neglist.
-        */
-       CK_SLIST_FOREACH(ncp, (NCHHASH(hash)), nc_hash) {
-               if (ncp == oncp)
-                       break;
-       }
-
-       /*
-        * No match to begin with.
-        */
-       if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
-               goto out_abort;
-       }
-
-       /*
-        * The newly found entry may be something different...
-        */
-       if (!(ncp->nc_dvp == dvp && ncp->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
-           !bcmp(ncp->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, ncp->nc_nlen))) {
-               goto out_abort;
-       }
-
-       /*
-        * ... and not even negative.
-        */
-       nc_flag = atomic_load_char(&ncp->nc_flag);
-       if ((nc_flag & NCF_NEGATIVE) == 0) {
-               goto out_abort;
-       }
-
-       if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
-               goto out_abort;
-       }
-
-       cache_negative_promote(ncp);
-
-       SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
-       counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
-       cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
-       mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
-       return (cache_fpl_handled(fpl, ENOENT));
-out_abort:
-       cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
-       mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
-       return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
+       if (cache_negative_promote_cond(dvp, cnp, oncp, hash))
+               return (cache_fpl_handled(fpl, ENOENT));
+       else
+               return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
 }
 
 /*
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to