On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:16:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote: > > If you're referring to the FTP directory tree layout we wind up with: > > > > .../releases/amd64/9.0-RELEASE > > .../releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0 > > > > for an example of uname -m == uname -p. But for our two powerpc related > > architectures we get: > > > > .../releases/powerpc/9.0-RELEASE > > .../releases/powerpc/ISO-IMAGES/9.0 > > .../releases/powerpc/powerpc64/9.0-RELEASE > > .../releases/powerpc/powerpc64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0 > > > > I'm not sure I like the inconsistency. > > Given the available tradeoffs I prefer this to amd64/amd64. We could also > define the rule another way, which is if a given TARGET only has a single > TARGET_ARCH you just use TARGET, otherwise you use TARGET/TARGET_ARCH.
If we seem to employ some naming transition rule based on TARGET_ARCH and TARGET, why not simply check just for pc98 as I suggested earlier, and return TARGET in this case, and TARGET_ARCH otherwise? Generalizing, perhaps this rule can be extended to the list of TARGET/TARGET_ARCH combos for which we return TARGET, and TARGET_ARCH for the rest? (This is for ISO file names; for release directory structure John's suggestion looks reasonable.) ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
