On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:07:22PM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because
> it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly
> convenient since it means no casting on printf arguments is needed:
... 
> If there's no objections, I (or David or anyone else) can commit to
> the FreeBSD repository.

Unfortunately I don't like this change -- it promotes type sloppiness
that flies in the face of ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E).

the mixed definition of [u]_?int64_t as it catches improper code -- such
as assuming you can printf an int64_t with "%lld" when that is against
the standard.

-- 
-- David  (obr...@freebsd.org)
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to