On 2012/6/28 15:53, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:53:03AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/6/28 10:32, Attilio Rao wrote:
2012/6/28, David Xu<listlog2...@gmail.com>:
On 2012/6/28 10:21, Attilio Rao wrote:
2012/6/28, David Xu<listlog2...@gmail.com>:
On 2012/6/28 4:32, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Wed Jun 27 20:32:45 2012
New Revision: 237660
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237660
Log:
Optimize the handling of SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF, by using auxv
AT_NCPU
value if present.
MFC after: 1 week
Modified:
head/lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c
Modified: head/lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c
==============================================================================
--- head/lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c Wed Jun 27 20:24:25 2012 (r237659)
+++ head/lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c Wed Jun 27 20:32:45 2012 (r237660)
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include<sys/resource.h>
#include<sys/socket.h>
+#include<elf.h>
#include<errno.h>
#include<limits.h>
#include<paths.h>
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include "../stdlib/atexit.h"
#include "tzfile.h" /* from
../../../contrib/tzcode/stdtime */
+#include "libc_private.h"
#define _PATH_ZONEINFO TZDIR /* from tzfile.h */
@@ -585,6 +587,8 @@ yesno:
case _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF:
case _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN:
+ if (_elf_aux_info(AT_NCPUS,&value, sizeof(value)) == 0)
+ return ((long)value);
mib[0] = CTL_HW;
mib[1] = HW_NCPU;
break;
Will this make controlling the number of CPU online or CPU hotplug
be impossible on FreeBSD ?
If I think about hotplug CPUs I can think of other 1000
problems/races/bad situations to be fixed before this one, really.
These are problems only in kernel, but kib's change is about ABI
between userland and kernel, I hope we don't introduce an ABI which
is not extendable road stone.
I'm not entirely sure I see the ABI breakage here.
It is not breakage, it is the ABI thinks number of online cpu is fixed,
obviously, it is not the case in future unless FreeBSD won't support
dynamic number of online cpus.
If the AT_NCPUS
becames unconvenient and not correct at some point we can just fix
sysconf() to not look into the aux vector anymoe.
If you already know this will be a problem, why do you introduce it
and later need to fix it ?
Please note that
AT_NCPUS is already exported nowadays. I think this is instead a
clever optimization to avoid the sysctl() (usual way to retrieve the
number of CPUs).
But why don't you cache it in libc ? following code is enough:
static int online_cpu;
if (online_cpu == 0)
online_cpu = sysctl
return online_cpu;
Thread did evolved somewhat while I was AFK.
First, please note that the ABI which I designed there is fixable:
if kernel does not export AT_NCPUS at all, then auxv correctly handles
the situation returning an error, and libc falls back to sysctl(2).
Do we really want to bypass sysctl and instead passing all info via auxv
vector ?
I found the sysconf() is a bunch of switch-case, which is already slow,
before
_SC_NPROCESSES_ONLN, it has already a quite number of case branches,
and in your code, it calls _elf_aux_info() which also has some
switch-cases branch,
if you cache smp_cpus in libc, the call for _elf_aux_info is not needed,
and you
don't need code in kernel to passing it either, in any case, the code to
call
sysctl is still needed, so why don't we just use sysctl instead and cache
the result in libc ? this at least can generate small code and a bit
faster after
first call to sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSES_ONLN).
Second, sysconf(3) is very weird API. Note the following statement from
SUSv4: "The value shall not change during the lifetime of the calling
process, [XSI] [Option Start] except that sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) may
return different values before and after a call to setrlimit() which
changes the RLIMIT_NOFILE soft limit." Corresponding comment is also
present in sysconf.c.
So it declares the number of cpu is static and can not be changed.
So I do not see an issue there, esp. for advisory value which NCPUS is
anyway.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
