On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:46:59 pm Jack Vogel wrote: > No, like so: This looks good to me. The 82574 is supported by em(4) and not lem(4) it seems, hence removing that?
-- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
