On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:16:50AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Author: eadler
> Date: Thu Nov 29 05:16:50 2012
> New Revision: 243665
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243665
> 
> Log:
>   Mark non-returning function as such
>   
>   PR:         bin/172978
>   Approved by:        cperciva
>   MFC after:  3 days
> 
> Modified:
>   head/sbin/dump/dump.h
> 
> Modified: head/sbin/dump/dump.h
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/sbin/dump/dump.h     Thu Nov 29 03:48:39 2012        (r243664)
> +++ head/sbin/dump/dump.h     Thu Nov 29 05:16:50 2012        (r243665)
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void      trewind(void);
>  void writerec(char *dp, int isspcl);
>  
>  void Exit(int status) __dead2;
> -void dumpabort(int signo);
> +void dumpabort(int signo) __dead2;
>  void dump_getfstab(void);
>  
>  char *rawname(char *cp);
What is the goal of this change ?

It is arguably backward. There is absolutely no use to mark signal handler
as __dead2, and all other uses do not benefit from the redundand declaration.
Also, being quite removed from the function definition, there is a chance
that some future modification would make the attribute a lie.

Attachment: pgp8HsDrybbXz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to