No, it actually failed to compile at all on some older 9-stable laptops.. Hence my confusion.
Adrian On 29 May 2013 04:22, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2013-05-29 06:21, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> Author: adrian >> Date: Wed May 29 04:21:42 2013 >> New Revision: 251098 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251098 >> >> Log: >> Fix a false -> AH_FALSE. >> >> Now, why this hasn't tripped _any_ tinderbox builds yet, I dunno. >> It's been like this for a while. > > > Because 'false' will be implicitly converted to an enum HAL_BOOL value. > Adding a warning for such cases would result in a *lot* of noise, and > probably many angry developers. ;-) > > Note that in C++, such a call would result in an error: "no known > conversion from 'bool' to 'HAL_BOOL'". > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"