On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Nikolai Lifanov <lifa...@mail.lifanov.com> wrote: > It's net/svnup and is a great replacement for cvs, in my opinion. > CVS wasn't used for development for a long while anyway, so there is nothing > subversion is replacing that net/svnup wouldn't.
svnup still has a number of issues: both performance and stability (it tends to randomly core dump). I've stated before that I intended to import svnup when it became ready. I have no intention in taking part in whatever debate may happen here. Should we decide that we want 'svn lite' instead of svnup I am happy. Should we decide to use svnup, I am still happy to import it. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
