On 17.07.2013 8:48, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 17.07.2013 8:10, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> On 16.07.2013 11:26, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Modified: head/lib/libc/stdlib/getenv.c >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- head/lib/libc/stdlib/getenv.c Tue Jul 16 06:50:22 2013 >>> (r253379) >>> +++ head/lib/libc/stdlib/getenv.c Tue Jul 16 07:26:46 2013 >>> (r253380) >>> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ __setenv(const char *name, size_t nameLe >>> envVars[envNdx].valueSize = valueLen; >>> >>> /* Save name of name/value pair. */ >>> - env = stpcpy(envVars[envNdx].name, name); >>> + env = stpncpy(envVars[envNdx].name, name, nameLen); >>> if ((envVars[envNdx].name)[nameLen] != '=') >>> env = stpcpy(env, "="); >>> } >>> >> >> I am not sure what you are trying to fix, but you just made next line >> condition unpredictable random, since (envVars[envNdx].name)[nameLen] is >> never filled now and there is freshly malloced memory content, which is >> picked for != '=' comparison. >> >> Please back it out or fix. > > If I understand that right, correct version will be: > > env = stpncpy(envVars[envNdx].name, name, nameLen); > env = stpcpy(env, "="); > > Condition check is not needed.
Microoptimized: env = stpncpy(envVars[envNdx].name, name, nameLen); *env++ = '='; -- http://ache.vniz.net/ bitcoin:1G6ugdNY6e5jx1GVnAU2ntj2NEfmjKG85r _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
