----- Original Message -----
From: "David Chisnall" <thera...@freebsd.org>
On 25 Oct 2013, at 06:03, "Steven Hartland" <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
> As discussed on IRC while I agree removing CC is possibly the better
> fix moving forward, I think removing /usr/bin/CC has quite a bit more
> risk, especially at this stage in the release phase of 10.
I'm not sure what the risk is. CC is an IRIXism that was never part of any
standard. Linux distros don't seem to provide a CC, just a c++, so this is
unlikely to cause problems with ported code.
We've discussed removing CC for a while, and I think it's the right call.
We shouldn't forget that removing the creation of the link is not enough
to "remove" CC, it would also need to be added to the delete-old target
and also needs the user to run delete-old, which is a step not everyone
does ;-)
Given this even if we do remove CC I think its still prudent to keep the
fix for CC in clang as well.
Regards
Steve
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
