On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky <ma...@rinet.ru> wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Alan Somers wrote: > > [snip] > >> Even if nanosecond resolution isn't useful, monotonicity is. Nobody >> should be using a nonmonotonic clock just to measure durations. I >> started an audit of all of FreeBSD to look for other programs that use >> gettimeofday to measure durations. I haven't finished, but I've >> already found a lot, including xz, ping, hastd, fetch, systat, powerd, >> and others. I don't have time to fix them, though. Would you be >> interested, or do you know anyone else who would? > > From your list, hastd seems to be the most dangerous point to me. > > Adding trociny@ as one of the most active hastd-related committers so the > issue > would not be lost in the areas...
In hastd's case, the problematic comparison is only used to print debugging info. It happens twice, in primary.c lines 1978 and 2039. > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
