On 09/03/14 15:22, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:05:04 AM Nikolai Lifanov wrote: >> On 09/03/14 04:09, Steven Hartland wrote: >>> I'm looking to MFC this change so wanted to check if >>> anyone had an final feedback / objections? >>> >>> I know we currently have Alan's feedback on changing >>> the #ifdef __i386__ to #ifndef UMA_MD_SMALL_ALLOC >>> which sounds sensible but waiting Peter to comment on. >>> >>> Regards >>> Steve >> >> I have no technical input, but this change improves ARC usefulness for >> me quite a bit. I would like to see the improvement in 10-STABLE. > > Can you verify that the current 10-STABLE (as of today) with all the various > pagedaemon fixes still has ARC issues for your workload? >
It doesn't have any issues, but I noticed the improvement on CURRENT. I observed that just after this change, my package builder is much more likely to retain MFU and not evict useful things from there (the port tree) after large builds. However, I run a lot more 10.0-RELEASE than CURRENT and I would like to see this improvement release-bound. I would be happy to test this on 10-STABLE if you think that this is relevant. - Nikolai Lifanov _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
