Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [stuff snipped for brevity] > > Btw, your patch calls sbsndptr() in tcp_output(), which advances > > sb_sndptroff and sb_sndptr by the length. > > Then it loops around and reduces the length for the case where > > there are too many mbufs in the chain. > > > > Right, though this patch would need to understand segment lengths too > and not only count them. Yep. I didn't mean that you would want to use the patch, I was just suggesting that you might want to consider doing something like sbsnfmbuf() so that sb_sndptroff and sb_sndptr aren't being advanced in your patch.
All I did to make sbsndmbuf() was clone sbsndptr(), then take out the code that updated sb_sndptroff and sb_sndptr plus add a little bit that I found useful for my patch. As an aside, although allowing specification of a limit for segment size sounds like a good plan, I am not aware of hardware that can't handle a large segment? Good luck with it, rick _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
