Don't have a strong opinion on this because I'm not in the know lately, but was wondering:
1) if we wanted to keep NE1000/2000 support for FreeBSD in emulators? Probably not I assume? 2) Does Linux nuke these devices? why/why-not? On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 04:43, Sergey Kandaurov <pluk...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 25 January 2015 at 15:02, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> Author: des >>>> Date: Sun Jan 25 12:02:38 2015 >>>> New Revision: 277694 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277694 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Remove ISA NICs. Anyone still using these on amd64 can build their >>>> own kernel. >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> head/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC >>> >>> If so, what about i386? (I'd rather not pc98) >>> What about device isa in DEFAULTS? >> >> isa is still needed in some scenarios. I just don't remember the full >> details offhand (something about internal buses iirc... And IPMI for >> starters...) > > "isa” in this context should be read as “mainbus” not as “ISA slots”. You > can’t > remove it without some significant work, and even then the interface changes > to long established interfaces isn’t worth the pain. > > Warner > > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
