On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:08 +0000, Ruslan Bukin wrote: > > Author: br > > Date: Wed Jan 28 16:08:07 2015 > > New Revision: 277835 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277835 > > > > Log: > > Add ARMv7 performance monitoring counters. > > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1687 > > Reviewed by: rpaulo > > Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL > > > > Added: > > head/sys/dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_armv7.c (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_armv7.h (contents, props changed) > > Modified: > > head/lib/libpmc/libpmc.c > > head/sys/arm/arm/intr.c > > head/sys/arm/include/pmc_mdep.h > > head/sys/arm/ti/files.ti > > head/sys/conf/files.arm > > head/sys/dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_arm.c > > head/sys/dev/hwpmc/pmc_events.h > > head/sys/sys/pmc.h > > This was in phabricator for review for 27 hours before it got committed, > that's not enough time to allow people to actually review it. That > would be not enough time for even a simple change, let alone over a > thousand of lines of code. It certainly wasn't reviewed by those > actively working on arm pmc stuff recently (gnn and to a lesser degree, > me).
Ok, make sense, it actually was my first experience with PB, and I expected any activity from people who want to review this. > > Just from a quick glance at the part that wasn't truncated, I notice all > the inline asm stuff is wrong -- it duplicates what's already available > in cpu-v6.h. > I had a conversation with Andrew this morning, he pointed me out those defines in cpu-v6.h, but we agreed those are optional stuff. I.e. duplicates != wrong. I'll fix that. Thanks Ruslan _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"