On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

Will you mind if I rephrase that paragraph in the "inet.4" manual page from:

"This closes a minor information leak which allows remote observers to determine the rate of packet generation on the machine by watching the counter."

Into:

"This prevents high-speed information exchange between internal and external observers using packet frequency modulation. An outside observer can ping the outside facing port at a fixed rate watching the counter. An inside observer can ping the inside facing port watching the same counter. Even though packets don't flow between the two ports, data can be exchanged by watching changes in the packet rate. It is believed that data can be exchanged in Kb/s range this way. Setting this sysctl also prevents remote and internal observers to determine the rate of packet generation on the machine by watching the counter."

Yes, I think this is overly alarmist, and it suggests that other covert channels might not exist to be exploited if the knob is set -- which isn't true. We don't promise that there are no covert channels in FreeBSD, and we would be foolish if we did promise that.

Robert
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to