On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > If it is faster, is there any good reason to maintain both qsort and > mergesort > in the kernel then? > qsort is not stable; mergesort is. (It's a shame that glibc didn't pick up mergesort.) -Ben _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
