On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Svatopluk Kraus <s...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: skra > Date: Fri Jun 3 11:05:55 2016 > New Revision: 301266 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301266 > > Log: > Postpone allocation of IRQ resource to the time when interrupt > controller devices are attached. This has already been done for > bus_setup_intr(). > > There was no doubt that if someone wants to setup an interrupt, > corresponding interrupt controller device must already be attached. > However, the same must be valid for allocation of an interrupt > resource unless the allocation is done blindly, without any > information that such interrupt even exists. While it was done this > blind way before, it won't be possible after next INTRNG change. > > Modified: > head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c > > Modified: head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c Fri Jun 3 > 10:28:06 2016 (r301265) +++ > head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c Fri Jun 3 11:05:55 > 2016 (r301266) @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); > static struct resource_spec imx6_anatop_spec[] = { > { SYS_RES_MEMORY, 0, RF_ACTIVE }, > - { SYS_RES_IRQ, 0, RF_ACTIVE }, Why not mark it as optional? Andrew _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
