-----Original Message----- > From: <owner-src-committ...@freebsd.org> on behalf of Ian Lepore > <i...@freebsd.org> > Date: 2016-12-19, Monday at 11:20 > To: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>, Ravi Pokala <rpok...@mac.com> > Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepher...@gmail.com>, Dimitry Andric > <d...@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committ...@freebsd.org>, > "svn-src-...@freebsd.org" <svn-src-...@freebsd.org>, > "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r310171 - head/sys/sys > > On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 11:58 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Are there other precedence for avoiding the SCN macros in the tree as >> well, or is this new art? >> >> Warner > > There was another commit recently the fixed the same kind of scanf > error by making the variable fit the scanf type (changing uint64_t to > an explicit long long unsigned, iirc). I don't know if that alone > counts as a precedent, but IMO it's a more palatible fix than the > SCN/PRI ugliness.
With all apologies to Churchill, SCN/PRI are the worst way to address this in a machine-independent way, except for all the other ways that have been tried from time to time. :-P -Ravi (rpokala@) > -- Ian _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
