On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:57:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2017, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:19:08PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 May 2017, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> +.Pp > >>> +.Sy time_t > >>> +is always signed, it is 64-bits everywere except on i386 and 32-bit > >>> powerpc. > >> > >> Change "is always" to "On all supported arches" as elsewhere. > >> > >> "everywhere" > >> > >> "everywhere" is redundant. > > Ok. > > > >> > >> The whole second clause is redundant. Remove it. Leave it to the reader > >> to notice that the table has more 8's than 4's, and where the 4's are. > > No, this is one of the important reasons why this narrative text added > > at all. > > Why? You just added time_t to the table. It needs to be described twice > less than most types. > > Now I don't like the indirection long -> sizeof(void *) in the first table. > This is the only place where the size is not given as a literal. There > used to be space in the second table to give the size of long explicitly. > Now the space is used for time_t. It doesn't belong in the same table, > since it is not a basic type. > > Also, intptr_t and intmax_t are not in the tables. > > > diff --git a/share/man/man7/arch.7 b/share/man/man7/arch.7 > > index 47a72a1986d..62781430329 100644 > > --- a/share/man/man7/arch.7 > > +++ b/share/man/man7/arch.7 > > @@ -36,8 +36,9 @@ > > Differences between CPU architectures and platforms supported by > > .Fx . > > .Pp > > +If not explicitly mentioned, sizes are in bytes. > > The first clause is redundant. There are no explicit mentions of non-byte > sizes. > > > .Ss Type sizes > > -On all supported architectures, > > +On all supported architectures: > > I see a further problem with this clause. It is separated from the table > that it applies to, by both indentation and a blank line, so it appears > to apply to the second table also. > > Later sections don't have a blank line where they reasonably could. They > start with a section header, then no blank line between that and the single > table in the section.
Th discussion is now reduced to the opinions. Do you have any further objections due to factual mistakes or language errors in the proposed patch ? If not, I will commit it as is. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"