Do we even want to include the ports tree on install media? Extracting
ports from some out-of-date tarball doesn't seem to match best practices
for ports and it takes up quite a lot of space.
-Nathan
On 01/30/18 08:34, Steve Wills wrote:
Author: swills (ports committer)
Date: Tue Jan 30 16:34:56 2018
New Revision: 328593
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/328593
Log:
Change installer default to not install ports tree
Reviewed by: gjb, dteske, allanjude, bdrewery, mat
Approved by: gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14064
Modified:
head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh
Modified: head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh
==============================================================================
--- head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh Tue Jan 30 16:24:15 2018
(r328592)
+++ head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh Tue Jan 30 16:34:56 2018
(r328593)
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ desc_tests="${tests}"
default_doc=off
default_src=off
+default_ports=off
default_tests=off
default_base_dbg=off
default_lib32_dbg=off
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
