On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:42:07PM +0000, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> New Revision: 287782
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287782
>
> Log:
> MFC: r272715
> Allow vt(4) to disable terminal bell with
> `sysctl kern.vt.bell_enable=0`, similar as syscons(4) do.
> [...]
> +VT_SYSCTL_INT(enable_bell, 1, "Enable bell");
I think you've meant `sysctl kern.vt.enable_bell=0' in the commit log.
> + if (!vt_enable_bell)
> + return;
> +
> if (vd->vd_flags & VDF_QUIET_BELL)
> return;
Hm, I'm wondering why having another sysctl is required when there's already
a way to shut the bell up with VDF_QUIET_BELL flag?
Also, there's certain naming inconsistency between syscons(4) and vt(4).
On my stable/8 laptop, I see this:
$ sysctl -d hw.syscons.bell
hw.syscons.bell: enable bell
On my -CURRENT desktop, this:
$ sysctl -d kern.vt.enable_bell
kern.vt.enable_bell: Enable bell
./danfe
_______________________________________________
svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-10
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-10-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
