Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I always assumed there was a good reason for not allowing that.
> > is there not a "WITH_FOO" or "WITHOUT_FOO" for every MK_FOO?
>
> Which takes precedence? Using make MK_FOO=no allows forcing it off
WITHOUT_ wins this was topic of long discussion - I guess back in 2014
;-)
The original semantics of {MK_,WITH[OUT]_} were almost unusable,
they are at least now consistently predictable.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-10
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-10-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
