Author: marius
Date: Sun Jul  5 19:33:30 2015
New Revision: 285175
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285175

Log:
  MFC: r281751
  
  Refine the workaround for Intel HSD131 [1] added in r269052 (MFCed to
  stable/9 in r269593):
  - Use the full mask described by the erratum as with a sufficiently high
    number of these false-positives, the overflow bit (bit 62) additionally
    gets set [7].
  - HSD131 has been brought into several other Haswell-derived CPUs including
    to the next generation, i. e. Intel Broadwell. Thus, also skip reporting of
    these benign errors by default on CPU models affected by HSM142, HSW131 and
    BDM48 [2 - 5], describing the HSD131 silicon bug for additional models.
    Also, Celeron 2955U with a CPU ID of 0x45 have been reported to be covered
    by this fault [6], with the specification update concerned with HSM142 [2]
    only referring to 0x3c and 0x46.
  
  Submitted by: David Froehlich [7]
  Approved by:  re (kib)
  
  
http://www.intel.de/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/4th-gen-core-family-desktop-specification-update.pdf
 [1]
  
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/4th-gen-core-family-mobile-specification-update.pdf
 [2]
  
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/5th-gen-core-family-spec-update.pdf
 [3]
  
http://www.intel.de/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/core-m-processor-family-spec-update.pdf
 [4]
  
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/xeon-e3-1200v3-spec-update.pdf
 [5]
  https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2015-January/046878.html 
[6]

Modified:
  stable/9/sys/x86/x86/mca.c
Directory Properties:
  stable/9/sys/   (props changed)

Modified: stable/9/sys/x86/x86/mca.c
==============================================================================
--- stable/9/sys/x86/x86/mca.c  Sun Jul  5 19:32:10 2015        (r285174)
+++ stable/9/sys/x86/x86/mca.c  Sun Jul  5 19:33:30 2015        (r285175)
@@ -254,15 +254,24 @@ mca_mute(const struct mca_record *rec)
 {
 
        /*
-        * Skip spurious corrected parity errors generated by desktop Haswell
-        * (see HSD131 erratum) unless reporting is enabled.
-        * Note that these errors also have been observed with D0-stepping,
-        * while the revision 014 desktop Haswell specification update only
-        * talks about C0-stepping.
+        * Skip spurious corrected parity errors generated by Intel Haswell-
+        * and Broadwell-based CPUs (see HSD131, HSM142, HSW131 and BDM48
+        * erratum respectively), unless reporting is enabled.
+        * Note that these errors also have been observed with the D0-stepping
+        * of Haswell, while at least initially the CPU specification updates
+        * suggested only the C0-stepping to be affected.  Similarly, Celeron
+        * 2955U with a CPU ID of 0x45 apparently are also concerned with the
+        * same problem, with HSM142 only referring to 0x3c and 0x46.
         */
-       if (rec->mr_cpu_vendor_id == CPU_VENDOR_INTEL &&
-           rec->mr_cpu_id == 0x306c3 && rec->mr_bank == 0 &&
-           rec->mr_status == 0x90000040000f0005 && !intel6h_HSD131)
+       if (cpu_vendor_id == CPU_VENDOR_INTEL &&
+           CPUID_TO_FAMILY(cpu_id) == 0x6 &&
+           (CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) == 0x3c ||  /* HSD131, HSM142, HSW131 */
+           CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) == 0x3d ||   /* BDM48 */
+           CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) == 0x45 ||
+           CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) == 0x46) &&  /* HSM142 */
+           rec->mr_bank == 0 &&
+           (rec->mr_status & 0xa0000000ffffffff) == 0x80000000000f0005 &&
+           !intel6h_HSD131)
                return (1);
 
        return (0);
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-9
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to