In message <[email protected]>, Garrett Cooper write s: > Author: ngie > Date: Wed Jun 8 18:23:33 2016 > New Revision: 301681 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301681 > > Log: > MFstable/10 r301680: > > MFC r300625:
Why MFC to stable/10 and then to stable/9. Doesn't that make stable/10 stable/9's ancestor? When stable/9 was first branched,HEAD was its ancestor. Doesn't this cause confusing ancestry in the branch? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <[email protected]> or <[email protected]> FreeBSD UNIX: <[email protected]> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-9 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
