Thanks, Tony. I have looked at that.
>From what I can gather from reading a bunch of the generators, the usual methodology involves lots of code and very little in the way of convention. For example, every file in the template has to be explicitly referenced in the Java file instead of iterating over a template directory. Also, the Java code has to specify the name of each output file to be generated rather than relying on a convention such as using filename.extension.mustache to generate filename.extension from the Mustache template file automatically. This could lead to the elimination of almost all the Java code in each generator as well as the ability to extend them easily which is virtually impossible now without modifying the Java code (e.g. to add a new template file). Has there been any work that you know of to reduce the amount of code by adopting a standard set of conventions for writing new generators? If it were done properly, the generators could be as simple as a set of template files in a standard layout, with a tiny bit of configuration to make it go. Very much a meta-swagger specification where very little configuration could drive the whole thing. Thanks again, ssteinerX On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 12:52:57 PM UTC-5, tony tam wrote: > > Yes look in the readme for instructions for making a new module > > On Jan 28, 2017, at 9:34 AM, sste...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > So... > > I want to develop a new generator. > > I'd like to have it be a stand-alone bundle like: > > /mySuperBundle >> README.md >> .gitignore >> /template >> file1.md.mustache >> file2.txt.mustache >> /generator >> mySuperBundle.java > > > and so forth with tests etc. > > I'm an experienced programmer but have exactly zero experience setting up > or integrating with a Java project (on purpose; same reason I know nothing > about setting up Windows). > > This would seem a much better way of organizing new generators rather than > having them have to be monolithically compiled into the main project. > > So...is this even possible? Anyone want to help me get this set up or, if > it's been done before, a pointer to some clues? > > Thanks, > > ssteinerX > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Swagger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swagger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
