dhcp is not required, if you removed ip. I guess you figured that out and change to kvmsh looks good
my run using two instances went well. Each instance finished in less than 5:00 hours where as one instance would take 9:30 and results are good. so finally we could run multiple instances. And only one instance we could ssh into. that is fine to me. -antony On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:37:08PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> In the past few days I tried similar trick with KVM. There is no IP > >> address on swan112 which seems to work. I just started a testrun with two > >> instances. > >> > >> east, west, road.., swan12 ... > >> east1, west1, road1.., swan112... > >> > >> so far it appears to work. I will know more tomorrow. > > > > I've the same set up but I'm not seeing traffic, good to know this should > > work. > > And of course, rebuilding everything from scratch fixes what ever my > issue here was. Traffic now flows across 192.1.2 > > BTW, what did you do about DHCP vis: > > - <ip address='192.9.2.253' netmask='255.255.255.0'> > - <dhcp> > - <range start='192.9.2.128' end='192.9.2.196' /> > - </dhcp> > - </ip> > > Andrew _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev