On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:38:08PM -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > I get a lot of them. This isn't good or useful. > > I ran the following script: > > for i in testing/pluto/*/OUTPUT/*.diff ; do > if [ ! -s "$i" ] ; then > : no difference > elif grep '^[-+][0-9]' "$i" | grep -v "retransmission" > >/dev/null ; then > : echo $i not just retransmission > else > echo $i just RETRANSMISSION > fi > done > > Today I got 55 lines listing diff files containing only retransmission > messages. That means 55 extra files that I have to examine > pointlessly. > > What should be done? > > Should we calm the hair-trigger on retransmission?
I haven't figured out pattern in "retransmission *" yet. Another line that show up in several (20+ output files) IKEv1 tests as diff is: "discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I3" I wonder how useful is this line, in a typical user case. Why not change to a debug line? ipsec auto --up con <conn> output should be minimal. Is this line really necessary here? If we remove this line noise in ikev1 could be a bit less. A similar line in ikev2, is is in state.c I see it 6-10 tests. "discarding packet received during asynchronous work" a -antony _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
