On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Andrew Cagney wrote:
I am okay with this, but would like to hear from others before we move
forward.
Paul noticed 'more' is no good - 'more' debug information must be better, right?
So instead the very short TMI.
But Hugh did not like that. dbg_excessive() ? dbg_exorbitant() ?
(but we cannot abreviate those to dbg_ex() because then people think
"extra" which is also "good".
Maybe dbg_devel() ? But perhaps too many people consider themselves developers?
Seems dbg_tmi() is still the best candidate? :)
Paul
or maybe dbg_oh_no()
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
