On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 07:49, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 24, 2020, at 13:44, Andrew Cagney <andrew.cag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> They do. no = 0, yes = 1 and the man page does not explain this. > > > > So if I specify: > > ipsec-interface=no > > I get interface 0, and: > > No, you get no interface because 0 means no. This is because the current > Linux implementation uses IF_ID which does not see 0 as a valid ID.
Should it be =%no - since reserved tokens mostly start with %; then =0 can be an error? > > ipsec-interface=1 > > I get a random interface? > > You get ipsec1, same as when specifying “yes”. I think that's confusing. Especially if we've reserved %random or %unique or something as a future enhancement. > In the future, %unique will mean get a (pseudo)random interface name. > > I’m not sure what happens when you pick “10”, as I was confused about the > numbers maybe being in hex ? If I use =10, do I see xfrmi10 (or what ever) when listing interfaces? > Paul > _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
