On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:01:39PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Yea,
> 
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 11:47, Antony Antony <ant...@phenome.org> wrote:
> >
> > while fixing the bug, left=%eth1, reported in
> > https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan/2020/003458.html. I ran into a
> > !happy() and core dump. If I remove the following check the fix would work;
> > test case addconn-05
> >
> > sockaddr_to_endpoint
> > -               /* XXX: to strict? */
> > -               if (sa_len != sizeof(sa->sin)) {
> > -                       return "wrong length";
> > -               }
> 
> Many library calls return  the size of the sockaddr (IPv4 or 6), but
> here it isn't available.
> 
> I cleaned up the calling code so that it used and passed down struct
> ip_info instead of AF.  This way  .sockaddr_size can be passed in.

Thanks.

> I'm still not sure if the check is too strict though.
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev

Reply via email to