swan  

Messages by Thread

• [Swan] vpn ipsec not woring after changing connection to orange Marc
• [Swan] Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Joe Madden via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Joe Madden via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Joe Madden via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Leftid not being honored with PSK and %any Andrew Cagney
• [Swan] gsoc@ working Andrew Cagney
• [Swan] GSoC 2026 Interest — Downgrade Prevention MAC Project Fatma Mohamed
  • [Swan] Re: GSoC 2026 Interest — Downgrade Prevention MAC Project Andrew Cagney
• [Swan] Libreswan IPsec VPN software support Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
  • [Swan] Re: Libreswan IPsec VPN software support Paul Wouters via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Libreswan IPsec VPN software support Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
• [Swan] Ip exclusion in libreswan policy files Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] IPv6 subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Skye Dobson
  • [Swan] Re: IPv6 subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: IPv6 subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Skye Dobson
  • [Swan] Re: IPv6 subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Skye Dobson
  • [Swan] Re: subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Skye Dobson
  • [Swan] Re: subnet-to-host selecting wrong %defaultroute interface Andrew Cagney
• [Swan] is it possible to apply opportunistic ipsec on a Linux Virtual Machine with one network interface that has two IPs Kozikowski, Mark
  • [Swan] Re: is it possible to apply opportunistic ipsec on a Linux Virtual Machine with one network interface that has two IPs Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: is it possible to apply opportunistic ipsec on a Linux Virtual Machine with one network interface that has two IPs Kozikowski, Mark via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: is it possible to apply opportunistic ipsec on a Linux Virtual Machine with one network interface that has two IPs Kozikowski, Mark via Swan
• [Swan] Fragmentation with IPsec enabled Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Fragmentation with IPsec enabled Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] Exclude interfaces Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Exclude interfaces Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Exclude interfaces Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Exclude interfaces Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Exclude interfaces Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Exclude interfaces Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Exclude interfaces Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] Ipsec config with two sections one in clear and one private-or-clear Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Ipsec config with two sections one in clear and one private-or-clear Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Ipsec config with two sections one in clear and one private-or-clear Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: Ipsec config with two sections one in clear and one private-or-clear Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] ikev2 is limited to only a few connections Greg Borbonus
  • [Swan] Re: ikev2 is limited to only a few connections Marc
  • [Swan] Re: ikev2 is limited to only a few connections Greg Borbonus
• [Swan] Trying to setup ikev2 with custom PAM module, auth done via user/pass and wildcard TLS Viktor Keremedchiev via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: Trying to setup ikev2 with custom PAM module, auth done via user/pass and wildcard TLS Viktor Keremedchiev via Swan
• [Swan] SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: SEGV using NULL authentication with multiple peers Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] To assign an ip to XFRM interface Ivan Kuznetsov
• [Swan] ipsec preconfiguration Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: ipsec preconfiguration Brady Johnson
  • [Swan] Re: [External] : Re: ipsec preconfiguration Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] leave SCHMID Stefan via Swan
  • [Swan] leave SCHMID Stefan via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: leave Marc
• [Swan] Re: [hwdsl2/setup-ipsec-vpn] Assign static IPs to VPN clients problem (Issue #1620) Paul Wouters
• [Swan] win client with multiple certs Marc
  • [Swan] Re: win client with multiple certs manfred
• [Swan] 2x win10 - 1 complains about expired server crt??? Marc
• [Swan] After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Paul Wouters
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known Andrew Cagney
  • [Swan] Re: After update to libreswan 5.1 - cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known antonio via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-5.1 released on Oct 8 The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] Libreswan Support for few Algos. Vinayak Telkar via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Libreswan Support for few Algos. Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] Help regarding AH_AES_128_GMAC in ipsec.conf Rajyalakshmi K via Swan
• [Swan] ipsec-interface=yes in .conf files Mamta Gambhir via Swan
• [Swan] IPsec service start mode Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] IPsec service start mode Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] [External] : Re: IPsec service start mode Mamta Gambhir via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] [External] : Re: IPsec service start mode Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] routed vpn with 2 tunnels cannot ping from one subnet to the other Bram via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] routed vpn with 2 tunnels cannot ping from one subnet to the other Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-5.0 released The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-5.0rc3 Release Candidate 3 released The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Data sent in clear despite established tunnel Phil Nightowl via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-4.15 released to address CVE-2024-3652 The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] How to re-enable IKEv1 on Rocky linux 9 / RHEL9? Viktor Keremedchiev via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] How to re-enable IKEv1 on Rocky linux 9 / RHEL9? Tuomo Soini via Swan
• [Swan] ABORT: ASSERTION FAILED - bug? Bán László via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] ABORT: ASSERTION FAILED - bug? Andrew Cagney via Swan
• [Swan] Regarding: pluto error message in pcaket capture kumar priyankar via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Regarding: pluto error message in pcaket capture Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] Libreswan 5.0rc2 cannot start on debian bullseye antonio via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Libreswan 5.0rc2 cannot start on debian bullseye Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Libreswan 5.0rc2 cannot start on debian bullseye antonio via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Libreswan 5.0rc2 cannot start on debian bullseye Andrew Cagney via Swan
• [Swan] Android 14 - IKEv2/IPSEC PSK antonio via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Android 14 - IKEv2/IPSEC PSK Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] libreswan client sending local ip as traffic selector Marc via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-4.14 released to address CVE-2024-2357 and compile fix for 4.13 The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-5.0rc2 Release Candidate 2 released The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] [Swan-announce] libreswan-4.13 released to address CVE-2024-2357 The Libreswan Team via Swan
• [Swan] INFORMATIONAL request has no corresponding IKE SA; message dropped Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] INFORMATIONAL request has no corresponding IKE SA; message dropped Andrew Cagney via Swan
• [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Andrew Cagney via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios John Crisp via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios manfred via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios manfred via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios John Crisp via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios John Crisp via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios Andrew Cagney via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] default config that works with recent android/win10/win11/macos/ios John Crisp via Swan
• [Swan] fedora client ikev2 client cert - getting CHILD SA failed Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] fedora client ikev2 client cert - getting CHILD SA failed Andrew Cagney via Swan
• [Swan] IKE SA authentication request rejected by peer: INVALID_SYNTAX John Crisp via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] IKE SA authentication request rejected by peer: INVALID_SYNTAX Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] IKE SA authentication request rejected by peer: INVALID_SYNTAX John Crisp via Swan
• [Swan] SAML2.0 authentication David Valiente via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] SAML2.0 authentication Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] SAML2.0 authentication David Valiente via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] SAML2.0 authentication Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] SAML2.0 authentication David Valiente via Swan
• [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Tuomo Soini via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? hrusa--- via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Phil Nightowl via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT? Paul Wouters via Swan
• [Swan] what problem do I have here? Marc
  • Re: [Swan] what problem do I have here? Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] what problem do I have here? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] what problem do I have here? Marc via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] what problem do I have here? Paul Wouters via Swan
  • Re: [Swan] what problem do I have here? Marc via Swan
• [Swan] always shitty orange is now fucking up ipsec connection Marc
  • Re: [Swan] always shitty orange is now fucking up ipsec connection Marc
  • Re: [Swan] always shitty orange is now fucking up ipsec connection Paul Wouters
  • Re: [Swan] always shitty orange is now fucking up ipsec connection Marc
• [Swan] win10 (/ win11?) client user certs instead of machine Marc
  • Re: [Swan] win10 (/ win11?) client user certs instead of machine Paul Wouters
  • Re: [Swan] win10 (/ win11?) client user certs instead of machine Marc
• [Swan] ip based on certs Marc
  • Re: [Swan] ip based on certs Paul Wouters
  • Re: [Swan] ip based on certs Wolfgang Nothdurft
  • Re: [Swan] ip based on certs Marc
  • Re: [Swan] ip based on certs Paul Wouters
• [Swan] peer authentication requires policy RSASIG_v1_5 David Valiente

• Earlier messages