"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
>
> Jim Leonard boldly stated:
> >
> >Undesireable Defects? Anyone?
>
> I dunno. It's not bad, but it begs the question: What's a desirable
> defect? 8)
>
> BTW, I realized a problem with my Inferior suggestions. It might be
> confused with Item Missing. So then I thought why not change it to
> just Missing, but that's too easy to confuse with MS. Then I thought
> maybe IM could be changed to Gone (no, there's Good). Uh, Absent?
> Lost?
I'd rather leave Item Missing alone and rename the rating. Hm...
If there's no such thing as a "desirable defect" ;-) then how about Undesirable
Condition?
--
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
