good suggestion, it hadn't crossed my mind to take a similar swf and
convert it to xml to get at what i need, simple but i missed it.  thanks.

Mark Winterhalder wrote:
> just another note...
>
> i really can't emphasise this enough, because imho it's a
> killer-feature that hardly anybody understands (so i'm very happy
> somebody is finally looking into this):
>
> look at swfml-s ("simple") as an example. you can use swf2xml to
> produce something like a template swfml-ll and come up with your own
> custom dialect where a single xml tag is a complex clip, even with
> action tags if you like, where some custom values get filled in. that
> means you can use some existing xml file and directly convert it to
> swf in a single step.
> say you've got an address book xml. your stylesheet would have the
> swfml-ll for a business card clip, a GUI and logic as a header, and
> the entries would get directly converted into one frame each, putting
> the business card clip onto the stage, and adding action tags that
> instantiate it with the values. just as an example. you could also be
> drawing a sales chart or whatever, with e.g. <chart type="bars"><bar
> value="..." month="..." /><bar ... />...</chart>. you get the idea.
>
> mark
>
>
> On 3/28/06, Mark Winterhalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>>> am
>>> i correct in my understanding that the basic profile is just another
>>> built-in xslt similar to simple.
>>>       
>> as far as i understand it, no. "basic" (or "swfml-ll", for "low level"
>> as it is called now) is the mother of all swfml dialects, pretty much
>> a SWF file format representation in XML. this is what "simple"
>> ("swfml-s") is being transformed to by the built-in "simple"
>> stylesheet, and what your custom-xslt must transform your
>> custom-dialect to:
>>
>> [xml  --xslt-->]  [swfml-ll  --swfmill-->  swf]
>>
>> the second chunk is what "swfmill xml2swf" does, there's no way around
>> that part of the chain, it's swfmill's core functionality (along with
>> "swf2xml", which gives you swfml-ll as output). the first part is
>> added for convenience because swfml-ll would be very inconvenient to
>> work with for mere mortals. so "simple" is a built-in xslt for the
>> common swfml-s XML dialect which you can replace by using your custom
>> xslt with "swfmill xslt <custom-xslt> <custom-xml> <output.swf>",
>> which outputs to swfml-ll for further processing.
>>
>> hth,
>> mark
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/06, Robert Jonathan Molesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> well, i haven't got quite that far just yet.  more or less going to do
>>> some testing with the basic profile using some xml, if that works like i
>>> expect it to then i'll get into some xslt coding.  just trying to
>>> determine what's required with the basic profile to compile an swf.  am
>>> i correct in my understanding that the basic profile is just another
>>> built-in xslt similar to simple.
>>>
>>> Mark Winterhalder wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On 3/27/06, Jon Molesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Daniel or Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> hmm... i'm just a user, if you roll your own xslt you know much more
>>>> than i do already... :)
>>>>
>>>> mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I've been looking over the basic profile located at
>>>>> http://iterative.org/swfmill/doc/reference.html.  I'm beginning to work
>>>>> on some xslt for swfmill.  The about this document mentions that it is
>>>>> organized into chapters including Actions.  Is this a typo, an reference
>>>>> to an incomplete feature, or am I just missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also in reference to symbols, in the brief example would button creation
>>>>> also need to be included within the <symbols> tag?  I'm interested in
>>>>> see what all I can do exactly.  My guess is that swfmill is a complete
>>>>> or near complete inplementation of the swf library, and that the
>>>>> documentation just doesn't show it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to document my progress with the xslt endevor as I mentioned a
>>>>> while back about documenting this project, but I'll need some help from
>>>>> you guys along the way.  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon Molesa
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swfmill mailing list
>>>>> swfmill@osflash.org
>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> http://snafoo.org/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swfmill mailing list
>>>> swfmill@osflash.org
>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> Jon Molesa
>>> Owner - Consoltec
>>> 828-994-2067
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://www.consoltec.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swfmill mailing list
>>> swfmill@osflash.org
>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> http://snafoo.org/
>>
>>     
>
>
> --
> http://snafoo.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> swfmill mailing list
> swfmill@osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>
>   

-- 
Jon Molesa
Owner - Consoltec
828-994-2067
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.consoltec.net

_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org

Reply via email to