Yeah, if there's not actually a bug/problem then why change it? Can anyone reproduce the issue in the link above while using SWFObject?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Bobby <[email protected]> wrote: > > We're already using the type="application/x-shockwave-flash" for all > non IE browsers, it should _not_ be used for IE, because we don't want > to mix it with a classid. > > Any way, I have never seen a report like this for SWFObject and I > never saw it popping up myself. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
