To my knowledge, the only thing about SWFObject that should cause issues with minimizers is the IE conditional complilation stuff. It's been tossed around as perhaps something we could do away with in a future version, but I'm not thinking we've decided to go in that direction. So for right now, I think the answer is probably no.
I think since swfobject is already compressed, it should just be considered a pre-compressed asset and not passed through the minimizers again. This is probably the safest bet. --Kyle -------------------------------------------------- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:59 PM To: "SWFObject" <[email protected]> Subject: AssetPackager and SWFObject > > First of SWFObject is awesome... > > I read the details in this thread: > http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject/browse_thread/thread/ad42cf0904cbf8ae/ea7daf23cd6070cf?lnk=gst&q=minify#ea7daf23cd6070cf > > SWFObject fails when used with the popular Rails js minfiy/packager > because of the specific IE fixes and I think some unquoted regex's. > > So, I had to leave out SWFObject from my packaged js and load 2 files > on my site. The whole Prototype/Scriptaculous/PLUS MY FILES as base.js > and a separate swfobject.js file. > > Has anyone else encountered this? > > I'm usually very cautious and have a unit test that jslints my > javascript files that I write so that it will work when compressed and > packaged with the rest of the js files on my sites. > > Seems like SWFObject can be modified slightly to fix the issues with > the different minimizers. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
