@k Guleesh - Thanks for the persistence to work out what was actually the
use case to reproduce. It makes our life a lot easier in finding possible
fixes.

I have added a issue entry for this now:
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/issues/detail?id=338

@Rostislav - let me know what you would like to do in order to look into the
SWFObject 2.2 + SWFAddress 2.3 incompatibility. I am happy to set up some
test cases etc to try to work through what is actually going on.


Cheers,
Aran




On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Getify Solutions, Inc. <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Indeed, get "No flashvars" now.
>
> --Kyle
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "k.s.guleesh" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:00 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
>  Subject: Re: Flashvars problem in IE7 IE6 with swfobject 2.2
>
> >
> > Thanks for testing it Kyle -
> >
> > you may have caught it at the moment I changed to using swfaddress 2.2 -
> > I have changed it back to use swfaddress 2.3
> >
> > It should be broken again now.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:30 -0500, Getify Solutions, Inc. wrote:
> >> I see a playlist ID in IE7 on winXP SP3.
> >>
> >> --Kyle
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> From: "k Guleesh" <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 6:48 AM
> >> To: "SWFObject" <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: Flashvars problem in IE7 IE6 with swfobject 2.2
> >>
> >> >
> >> > So did you actually click on this link ?
> >> > http://dev.simply.tv/static/
> >> >
> >> > I would like to know if  it displays a PLAYLIST ID or does is say NO
> >> > FLASHVARS when viewed in IE6 or IE7 -
> >> >
> >> > Just because one test in the test_suite works - that doesn't exclude
> >> > the possibility of a bug. Just means you may have to write a better
> >> > test.
> >> >
> >> > One issue that you haven't answered - why does changing it to
> >> > swfobject 2.1 (and leaving everything else the same) work in IE7 IE6 ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Jul 6, 9:38 am, k Guleesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> Indeed - I am surprised no else has reported anything and am willing
> >> >> to accept that this may be down to something very stupid that I'm
> >> >> doing - what raised the alarm bell for me was that changing only the
> >> >> swfobject version to 2.1 made theflashvarswork.
> >> >>
> >> >> The Dynamic publishing test link you provided does work - so now I'm
> >> >> really confused.
> >> >> Could this be a flex / swfobject issue ?
> >> >>
> >> >> I have tested this in 3 ways on 3 machines
> >> >>
> >> >> machine 1 - windows XP SP2 IE6
> >> >> machine 2 - windows XP SP3 IE7.0.5730.13
> >> >> machine 3 - windows XP SP3 IETester (buggy test app with a bunch of
> IE
> >> >> ActiveX plugins IE5.5 IE6 IE7 IE8)
> >> >>
> >> >> It fails on all 3 setups in IE6 and IE7.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am wondering what happens if people visit my test link - does it
> >> >> work for them ? - and if there could possibly be an issue with the
> way
> >> >> Flex loads the vars.
> >> >>
> >> >> I didn't think for a minute that swfobject was released without
> >> >> testing - that is why I am very surprised by what I'm seeing here.
> >> >>
> >> >> In the mean time I have concocted an ExternalInterface call to pull
> in
> >> >> theflashvarsobject as a workaround - but I figured this needed
> >> >> reporting.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Jul 6, 3:10 am, Aran Rhee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > So do the test suite files work for you in IE6 / 7 ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/test_suite
> >> >>
> >> >> > specifically:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Dynamic publishing params
> >> >> > test:
> http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/swfobject/testsuite_2_2/test_dynamic_...
> >> >>
> >> >> > Static publishing params
> >> >> > test:
> http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/swfobject/testsuite_2_2/test_params.html
> >> >>
> >> >> > FYI - Before we release anything into the wild, we test builds with
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > wide
> >> >> > range of browsers, and we did not see any errors withFlashvars. You
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > first person to report this potential issue (and I would have
> >> >> > thought
> >> >> > we'd
> >> >> > have a lot more people complaining if 2.2 broke something as basic
> >> >> > as
> >> >> >flashvars:)
> >> >>
> >> >> > How are you testing in IE6/7? do you have actual installs or are
> you
> >> >> > using
> >> >> > something like Tredosoft multiple IE or browsershots.org etc?
> >> >>
> >> >> > Aran
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:13 AM, k Guleesh
> >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > > please look at this example I have made.
> >> >> > >http://dev.simply.tv/static
> >> >>
> >> >> > > The example works if I use swfobject 2.1 but breaks with 2.2 in
> >> >> > > IE7
> >> >> > > and IE6
> >> >>
> >> >> > > Has anybody else noticedflashvarsbroken in 2.2 ?
> >> >>
> >> >> > > here is the flex app:
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> >> >> > > <mx:Application
> >> >> > > xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> >> >> > > layout="absolute"
> >> >> > > applicationComplete="onCreation()"
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <mx:Script>
> >> >> > > <![CDATA[
> >> >> > > import mx.controls.Alert;
> >> >> > > private function onCreation():void
> >> >> > > {
> >> >>
> >> >> > > if(Application.application.parameters.playlist_id != null)
> >> >> > > {
> >> >> > > var playlist_id =
> >> >> > > Application.application.parameters.playlist_id;
> >> >> > > Alert.show("PLAYLIST ID =
> >> >> > > "+playlist_id);
> >> >> > > }
> >> >> > > else
> >> >> > > {
> >> >> > > Alert.show("NOFLASHVARS");
> >> >> > > //var s =
> >> >> > > ExternalInterface.call("getFlashvars");
> >> >> > > //trace(s)
> >> >> > > }
> >> >> > > }
> >> >> > > ]]>
> >> >> > > </mx:Script>
> >> >> > > </mx:Application>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > here is the html :
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <html>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <head>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <script type="text/javascript" src="swfobject.js"></script>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <script type="text/javascript" src="swfaddress.js"></script>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <script type="text/javascript">
> >> >>
> >> >> > > // <![CDATA[
> >> >>
> >> >> > > varflashvars= {
> >> >>
> >> >> > > playlist_id : "25618049001"
> >> >>
> >> >> > > };
> >> >>
> >> >> > > var params = {
> >> >>
> >> >> > > scale: "noscale",
> >> >>
> >> >> > > AllowScriptAccess: "sameDomain",
> >> >>
> >> >> > > allowFullscreen: "true",
> >> >>
> >> >> > > bgcolor : "#222222"
> >> >>
> >> >> > > };
> >> >>
> >> >> > > var attributes = {
> >> >>
> >> >> > > id: "swf_div",
> >> >>
> >> >> > > name: "swf_div"
> >> >>
> >> >> > > };
> >> >>
> >> >> > > swfobject.embedSWF('FlashvarsTest.swf', "swf_div", "826", "350",
> >> >> > > "9.0.115","expressInstall.swf",flashvars, params, attributes);
> >> >>
> >> >> > > // ]]>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > </script>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > </head>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <body>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > <div id="swf_div">
> >> >>
> >> >> > > </div>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > </body>
> >> >>
> >> >> > > </html>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SWFObject" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to