On 02/08/2011 02:39 AM, Ricardo Pedroso wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Chris<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:02:16 +0000
Ricardo Pedroso<[email protected]> wrote:
2011/2/7 Pablo Rodríguez<[email protected]>:
Is this intended or is it a bug? If this is intended, is there any way> >to
get the old settings working?
Just guessing...
Is it possible that your 0.9.0 is compile with lame enable and 0.9.1 is>not?
In any event, why would libmp3lame affect the encoding of a wave file?
libmp3lame is a mp3 encoder, so I was thinking that swfc could be taken a wav
and automaticaly convert to an mp3.
But I take a quick look at the code and it seems that was not the case.
A wav will be defined as a wav and a mp3 as a mp3 in the resulting swf.
So my guessing was wrong. :-/
Ricardo
Hi
Just guessing here, but wav implies pcm which is uncompressed audio. Is
it possible you're just not compressing the swf?
Chris
