Not really Pepa, no. Unfortunately, I am not that familiar with the source code Possibly something to do with the glyphs. I think similar issues have previously been reported on the mailing list.
Regards, Chris. >On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:13:03 +0200 >Massassi Pepito <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Chris, > > Do you have any Ideas concerning my problem, as I explained it last time. > > Regards, > Pepa > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Massassi Pepito <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Chris, > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > Here is the actual pdf file (page 3) > > http://www.thrill-project.com/archiv/stahlman<http://www.thrill-project.com/archiv/stahlmann.pdf> > > n.pdf <http://www.thrill-project.com/archiv/stahlmann.pdf> > > > > The pdf2swf version I use: 2010-08-05-2217 > > > > Regards, > > Pepa > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:53:16 +0200 > >> >Massassi Pepito <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hello, > >> > >> > > >> > the current pdf2swf tools outputs by default the swf version 6. > >> > > >> > How can I improve it in order to get the swf version 10 (9), since using > >> - T > >> > 10 (9) gives me a weird output? > >> > >> > For a better illustration of my problem, I attached two swf files > >> > - testT6_3.swf (flash version 6 using -T 6) > >> > - testT9_3.swf (flash version 9 using -T 9) > >> > >> > Regards, > >> > pepa > >> > >> It might be a better idea if you linked to the actual pdf casuing the > >> trouble. ;o) > >> > >> Which SWFTools version(s) have you tried? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> Chris. > >> -- > >> <[email protected]> > >> > >> > > -- Chris <[email protected]>
